Reproduce “Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Text” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Nicholas Carlini, David Wagner
Researchers at UC Berkeley developed targeted audio adversarial examples that manipulate existing audio waveforms to be transcribed by state-of-the-art speech-to-text systems as any chosen phrase, achieving a 100% success rate with an average perturbation of -31dB, largely imperceptible to human listeners. Their method can also embed long phrases into short clips and cause non-speech audio to be recognized as speech.
Key insights
- Targeted audio adversarial examples are highly effective against state-of-the-art ASR systems, successfully changing transcriptions to arbitrary phrases with near-imperceptible distortions, contrary to previous beliefs about their difficulty.
- The efficacy of these attacks relies critically on iterative optimization due to the non-linear nature of the audio CTC loss landscape, rendering single-step methods like FGSM ineffective for targeted audio adversarial examples.
- Beyond simple misclassification, attacks can achieve high information density (e.g., 50 characters/second from short audio), cause non-speech audio to be recognized as speech, and even effectively 'silence' spoken words.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.