Reproduce “Causal Confusion in Imitation Learning” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Pim de Haan, Dinesh Jayaraman, Sergey Levine
This paper identifies and addresses 'causal misidentification' in imitation learning, a problem where policies learn non-causal correlations from demonstrations that lead to failures when deployed. It proposes a targeted interventional framework that combines graph-parameterized policy learning with efficient expert queries or policy execution to identify and rely on true causal factors, resulting in significantly improved robustness and sample efficiency.
Key insights
- Behavioral cloning's discriminative nature makes it susceptible to learning non-causal correlations (causal misidentification) from expert demonstrations.
- This causal misidentification, exacerbated by distributional shift during policy deployment, leads to compounding errors and poor performance.
- Targeted active interventions, where the agent interacts with the environment or queries an expert, can efficiently identify the true causal factors needed for robust imitation.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.