Reproduce “The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical Information” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Antonis Papasavva, Max Aliapoulios, Cameron Ballard, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn
An analysis of QAnon’s “Q drops” shows that the movement’s authoritative corpus was assembled through inconsistent third-party archiving, contested authentication, and concentrated cross-platform dissemination. Across nearly 4,950 canonical posts, stylometric differences suggested multiple authors, while the drops themselves were typically cryptic and low in explicit toxicity or threat language despite supporting themes of government overthrow, religious conspiracy, and political resistance.
Key insights
- Canonicalization was editorial rather than fully consistent: agreement among aggregators was only fair after excluding an inactive site, and 299 tripcode-associated posts were absent from every archive.
- Writing differences across major tripcodes supported the possibility that multiple people operated the Q identity, although the analysis could not determine the number of authors or their coordination.
- The drops’ influence relied less on explicit threats than on cryptic, highly interpretable messages that followers, curators, and political communities could decode and connect to broader conspiratorial narratives.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.