Reproduce “Model-Free and Model-Based Policy Evaluation when Causality is Uncertain” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
David Bruns-Smith
Research identifies that the tractability of off-policy evaluation with unobserved confounders depends critically on whether confounders are IID across periods. The work develops both model-free and robust model-based methods for computing worst-case finite-horizon policy value bounds under this assumption, demonstrating that model-based approaches yield sharper estimates by leveraging domain knowledge.
Key insights
- The assumption that unobserved confounders are IID each period is the crucial factor determining the tractability of off-policy evaluation, as it simplifies the problem to an MDP over observed states.
- Integrating domain knowledge about transition confounding (Δ) into model-based robust MDPs produces substantially tighter and more useful lower bounds compared to model-free direct methods.
- Policy evaluation becomes significantly more difficult with persistent unobserved confounders, leading to highly conservative bounds, which identifies a major open challenge for future research.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.