Reproduce “Sampling-Based Accuracy Testing of Posterior Estimators for General Inference” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Pablo Lemos, Adam Coogan, Yashar Hezaveh, Laurence Perreault-Levasseur

Researchers at Mila and Université de Montréal developed Tests of Accuracy with Random Points (TARP), a sample-based framework for validating posterior estimators. This method enables rigorous accuracy testing for generative models, effectively detecting biases that conventional high-posterior density methods fail to identify, and scales to high-dimensional parameter spaces.

Key insights

  • The core theoretical insight is Theorem 3, proving that correct expected coverage probability, when assessed with positionable credible regions whose positions can depend on the observation, is a necessary and *sufficient* condition for verifying posterior estimator accuracy.
  • Existing HPD-based coverage tests are insufficient because HPD regions are not positionable and can produce false positives, such as incorrectly validating uninformative estimators that simply return the prior distribution.
  • TARP's ability to sample reference points `θr` with dependence on the observation `x` is crucial for its sufficiency property, enabling it to detect subtle biases and inaccuracies that prior methods cannot.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.