Reproduce “What makes a successful rebuttal in computer science conferences? : A perspective on social interaction” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Junjie Huang, Win-bin Huang, Yi Bu, Qi Cao, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
The authors study conference rebuttals as interactions between authors and reviewers, analyzing score changes, reviewer-score patterns, and response features. Using ICLR 2022 data plus ACL 2018 and TCSC comparisons, they find balanced reviewer motifs increase after rebuttals and 17.95% of reviews rise. Papers whose average scores rise have 58.38% acceptance; these observational associations do not establish causation.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.