Reproduce “Large language models in medicine: the potentials and pitfalls” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Jesutofunmi A. Omiye, Haiwen Gui, Shawheen J. Rezaei, James Zou, Roxana Daneshjou
The paper from Stanford University offers healthcare practitioners a comprehensive guide to large language models (LLMs) in medicine, detailing their underlying technology, potential applications, and critical limitations. It specifically addresses accuracy issues, biases, and ethical concerns, proposing strategies for their responsible and effective integration into clinical and research settings.
Key insights
- LLMs exhibit emergent capabilities like reasoning and in-context learning, making them adaptable for diverse medical language tasks following a two-phase training process.
- While LLMs show promise in various medical applications, they are highly susceptible to generating 'hallucinations' (factually incorrect information) and show sensitivity to minor prompt variations.
- Critical limitations include the amplification of structural biases from training data (e.g., race-based medicine), potential for privacy breaches, and ethical concerns around misinformation and content generation.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.