Reproduce “CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Yinya Huang, Ruixin Hong, Hongming Zhang, Wei Shao, Zhicheng Yang, Dong Yu, Changshui Zhang, Xiaodan Liang and 1 more
Researchers from City University of Hong Kong, Tsinghua University, and Tencent AI Lab introduce CLOMO, a new generative task and benchmark for evaluating large language models' counterfactual logical reasoning abilities. Their work demonstrates that fine-tuning significantly improves smaller models, while top-tier models like GPT-4o approach and even surpass human performance on this challenging task.
Key insights
- Counterfactual logical modification is a highly challenging task for both humans (SES 0.580) and LLMs, demanding deep logical understanding and precise text editing.
- Current pre-training data for smaller LLMs likely lacks sufficient counterfactual reasoning patterns, as fine-tuning with CLOMO yields substantial performance improvements (e.g., LLaMA 2-13B zero-shot SES from 0.045 to 0.580).
- "Weaken" and "Sufficient Assumption" logical relations are particularly difficult for LLMs, indicating specific areas where reasoning capabilities need further development.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.