Reproduce “Quantifying and Enhancing Multi-modal Robustness with Modality Preference” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Zequn Yang, Yake Wei, Ce Liang, Di Hu
A theoretical framework from Renmin University of China quantifies multi-modal robustness, revealing how modality preference creates uneven vulnerabilities in AI models. This understanding informs their Certifiable Robust Multi-modal Training (CRMT) method, which improves resilience against diverse attacks and missing modalities, reducing performance disparities across different input types.
Key insights
- Multi-modal robustness is mathematically quantifiable, dependent on the individual discriminative strength (uni-modal representation margins) and the reliability of how modalities are integrated.
- Modality preference causes an "imbalance problem," where models rely too heavily on a single modality, resulting in fragile representations for others and amplified vulnerability to attacks on the preferred input.
- The proposed orthogonal-based framework simplifies the optimization of multi-modal robustness by decoupling representation learning from modality integration, enabling direct maximization of a certified lower bound.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.