Reproduce “Risk of Harm in VR Dating from the Perspective of Women and LGBTQIA+ Stakeholders” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Devin Tebbe, Meryem Barkallah, Braeden Burger, Douglas Zytko
Researchers from the University of Michigan-Flint identified and categorized potential harms in emerging VR dating environments from the perspectives of women and LGBTQIA+ individuals. The study revealed risks related to the transition from virtual to physical interactions and unmet expectations of romantic/sexual engagement.
Key insights
- Harms in VR dating are complex, encompassing issues of identity, communication, consent, and the blurred lines between virtual and physical realities, necessitating specific design interventions.
- The perception of what constitutes a harmful VR dating experience is subjective, highlighting the imperative to involve user stakeholders directly in anticipating harms and formulating preventative designs.
- Consent might be perceived as trivial or unnecessary by some users in VR due to a perceived "detachment from the physical world," increasing the risk of nonconsensual behavior.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.