Reproduce “Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Mingrui Wu, Jiayi Ji, Oucheng Huang, Jiale Li, Yuhang Wu, Xiaoshuai Sun, Rongrong Ji
This research from Xiamen University developed R-Bench, a new benchmark to evaluate relationship hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models, revealing that these models struggle more with relationship hallucinations than object hallucinations and perform poorly on fine-grained relational tasks. The study attributes these issues to data distribution biases and models' over-reliance on common sense over visual input.
Key insights
- Relationship hallucinations are more prevalent and severe in current LVLMs compared to object hallucinations, indicating a fundamental limitation in complex scene understanding.
- LVLMs demonstrate poor fine-grained local comprehension, struggling significantly with accurately identifying relationships between specific, localized objects.
- The long-tail distribution of relationship words in training data and specific relationship co-occurrence patterns (relationship-relationship, subject-relationship, relationship-object) contribute to these hallucinations.
- LVLMs tend to prioritize common-sense knowledge over visual evidence and struggle with sophisticated spatial and contextual reasoning, leading to counterfactual and illusion hallucinations.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.