Reproduce “Mixture of Parrots: Experts improve memorization more than reasoning” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Samy Jelassi, Clara Mohri, David Brandfonbrener, Alex Gu, Nikhil Vyas, Nikhil Anand, David Alvarez-Melis, Yuanzhi Li and 2 more

The authors test whether expert capacity helps recall more than reasoning. In synthetic phone-book lookup, a mixture-of-experts model with 42 million active parameters exceeds a dense model with ten times as many parameters on learned-entry recall. Across benchmarks, experts help world knowledge more than commonsense and math; this does not establish performance on unseen facts or all reasoning tasks.

Key insights

  • MoEs are theoretically and empirically more efficient for memorization tasks, leveraging their numerous experts to store vast amounts of information with fewer active parameters.
  • For reasoning tasks, MoE performance is primarily determined by the number of active parameters (effective width) rather than the total number of experts, indicating a fundamental limitation when active computation is constrained.
  • MoEs show a larger generalization gap on mathematical problems, suggesting they tend to memorize specific training examples instead of learning generalizable reasoning principles.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.