Reproduce “Causal Imitation Learning under Expert-Observable and Expert-Unobservable Confounding” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Daqian Shao, Thomas Kleine Buening, Marta Kwiatkowska
Researchers from Oxford and ETH Zurich developed a causal imitation learning framework that addresses both expert-observable and expert-unobservable confounding variables by reformulating the problem as a Conditional Moment Restriction. Their DML-IL algorithm consistently outperformed existing baselines in various custom and MuJoCo environments, achieving lower Mean Squared Error and higher average rewards by effectively accounting for these hidden factors.
Key insights
- Trajectory histories can effectively serve as instrumental variables to identify the expert's causal policy, even when both expert-observable and expert-unobservable confounders are present.
- Reformulating causal IL as a Conditional Moment Restriction problem enables the application of robust econometric tools and provides a principled approach for developing algorithms with theoretical guarantees.
- The imitation gap is influenced by three key factors: the imitator's ability to infer expert-observable confounders from history, the strength of the instrumental variable (confounding horizon), and the disturbance caused by expert-unobservable confounding noise.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.