Reproduce “Predicting Through Generation: Why Generation Is Better for Prediction” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Md Kowsher, Nusrat Jahan Prottasha, Prakash Bhat, Chun-Nam Yu, Mojtaba Soltanalian, Ivan Garibay, Ozlem Garibay, Chen Chen and 1 more
This paper from the University of Central Florida and collaborators proposes PredGen, an end-to-end framework that reformulates supervised prediction tasks for Large Language Models as token-level generation. The work demonstrates, both theoretically through the Data Processing Inequality and empirically, that this generation-based approach preserves more mutual information and consistently outperforms traditional pooling-based methods across diverse classification, regression, and arithmetic reasoning benchmarks.
Key insights
- Applying pooling operations to LLM hidden states for predictive tasks causes an irreversible loss of mutual information with the target output, as theoretically shown by the Data Processing Inequality.
- Fine-tuning LLMs by reformulating predictive tasks as token-level generation aligns more naturally with their pre-training objective, allowing for better leveraging of learned contextual information.
- Addressing challenges like exposure bias through scheduled sampling and format mismatch via a task adapter is crucial for robust generation-based prediction.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.