Reproduce “Better Hessians Matter: Studying the Impact of Curvature Approximations in Influence Functions” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Steve Hong, Runa Eschenhagen, Bruno Mlodozeniec, Richard Turner

The authors test whether curvature approximations improve influence-function data attributions for handwritten-digit predictions without retraining. They compare Hessian-based methods in tanh MLPs and evaluate rankings against retraining. Attribution fidelity tracks curvature fidelity, though approximation steps have regime-dependent effects; the experiments are limited to a small Digits task and do not establish the ordering for larger models or other architectures.

Key insights

  • A consistent inverse relationship exists between lower curvature approximation error and higher influence function fidelity (LDS), empirically confirming that better Hessian approximations improve attribution.
  • The within-block Kronecker factorisation (Block-GGN to K-FAC/EK-FAC) is identified as the largest contributor to total approximation error, largely due to spectral mis-scaling and eigenbasis mismatch.
  • Influence function fidelity's sensitivity to approximation errors varies with context: GGN approximation errors are critical early in training, while block-diagonal errors become more impactful in deeper networks.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.