Reproduce “Rethinking Expert Trajectory Utilization in LLM Post-training for Mathematical Reasoning” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Bowen Ding, Yuhan Chen, Jiayang Lyv, Jiyao Yuan, Qi Zhu, Shuangshuang Tian, Dantong Zhu, Futing Wang and 4 more

Researchers developed the Plasticity-Ceiling Framework to analyze LLM post-training for mathematical reasoning, establishing the sequential Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)-then-Reinforcement Learning (RL) pipeline as the superior approach. This method achieved a peak of 78.1 points on a composite mathematical benchmark, demonstrating that optimizing SFT to saturation maximizes the ultimate performance ceiling and preserves out-of-domain generalization.

Key insights

  • The sequential SFT-then-RL pipeline consistently outperforms other post-training paradigms, indicating that a robust SFT foundation is crucial for maximizing performance in mathematical reasoning.
  • The optimal SFT-to-RL transition point is identified as the SFT Stable or Mild Overfitting Regime, ensuring both high ultimate performance and preserved out-of-domain generalization.
  • Data scale is the primary determinant of the post-training performance ceiling, with trajectory difficulty acting as a performance multiplier when data scale is limited; minimum SFT validation loss serves as a reliable predictive indicator.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.