Reproduce “Socially-Weighted Alignment: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Systems” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Furkan Mumcu, Yasin Yilmaz

A game-theoretic framework called Socially-Weighted Alignment (SWA) is introduced for multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems, enabling agents to internalize collective welfare at inference time. The framework analytically derives a critical social weight (λ*) that predicts a phase transition from system overload to stable operation, a prediction empirically validated across various LLMs in shared-resource environments.

Key insights

  • A closed-form critical social weight (λ*) can be derived analytically, predicting a phase transition where the system shifts from persistent overload to stable operation as λ increases.
  • SWA effectively reshapes the game played by LLM agents, allowing for the design of system-level stability by aligning individual incentives with global well-being without costly retraining or parameter updates.
  • The proposed inference-time mechanism is model-agnostic and generalizes to various forms of negative externalities in multi-agent LLM workflows, such as API rate limits, context window management, and merge conflicts.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.