Reproduce “Hijacking Large Audio-Language Models via Context-Agnostic and Imperceptible Auditory Prompt Injection” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Meng Chen, Kun Wang, Li Lu, Jiaheng Zhang, Tianwei Zhang
AudioHijack studies third-party attacks that alter supplied audio to steer assistants toward attacker-chosen instructions while leaving user requests unchanged. It optimizes subtle audio perturbations across contexts. Across 13 models, non-tool PISR averages 0.89–0.95 and BMSR 0.84–0.94; SpeechGPT scores lower. On Voxtral-Mini, context-agnostic attacks achieved BMSR above 0.77, versus 0.18–0.65 for context-specific attacks on unseen contexts. The method requires model architecture and parameter access.
Key insights
- LALMs are fundamentally vulnerable to third-party auditory prompt injection across various architectures, scales, and even commercial systems, with over-optimization for structured outputs increasing susceptibility to tool misuse.
- AudioHijack effectively shifts the LALM's attention from user context to the adversarial audio, enabling robust generalization to unseen user instructions.
- Existing defense mechanisms (prompt-level, response-level, or logit-level) are largely ineffective against these attacks, highlighting the need for deeper internal scrutiny, such as attention deviation detection, though an effectiveness-detectability trade-off exists for adaptive attackers.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.