Reproduce “Measure, Don't Optimize: Forecasting Recovery in LLM Unlearning” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Zirui Song, Huaxing Liu, Xiang Wang, Shuai Li, Xinye Li, Lang Gao, Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Lu and 3 more

This research from MBZUAI and Alibaba Group investigates the persistence of forgotten knowledge in Large Language Models after unlearning procedures, introducing J-Access to audit internal representations. It demonstrates that behavioral forgetting is often insufficient, with 85% of unlearned models retaining internal access, and shows that J-Access can predict model-level knowledge recovery under subsequent attacks, though direct optimization of J-Access can lead to audit evasion rather than genuine knowledge deletion.

Key insights

  • Behavioral forgetting is insufficient; 85% of audited unlearned models retained internal access to forgotten knowledge at levels exceeding a retain-only gold model, despite passing behavioral checks.
  • Pre-attack J-Access reliably predicts model-level susceptibility to knowledge recovery under subsequent relearning attacks, providing a valuable diagnostic for assessing the long-term stability of unlearning.
  • Directly optimizing J-Access during unlearning leads to 'audit evasion,' where the measured signal decreases but post-attack knowledge recovery increases, indicating suppression of the audit metric rather than genuine knowledge deletion.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.