Reproduce “Security Assessment of DeepSeek Harness with A.I.G: Evaluating Resistance to Indirect Prompt Injection” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Zonghao Ying, Xiangfan Wu, Huiyu Wu, Xing Zheng, Huangsheng Cheng, Xiaorong Shi, Jing Guo
A security assessment by Tencent Zhuque Lab of the DeepSeek Harness (DSH) agent framework, using a controlled test matrix and runtime-level evaluation, quantified its resistance to indirect prompt injection attacks. The study revealed overall full attack success rates of 5.6% (J_R) and 5.3% (J_L), noting that attacks via "hidden Unicode" in file mode achieved 25.5% J_R full success, with "skills" channels demonstrating heightened susceptibility.
Key insights
- The specific carrier representation (e.g., file mode vs. text mode) significantly influences attack success, demonstrating that text-only evaluations can miss critical vulnerabilities arising from file-level parsing and metadata.
- There is a crucial difference between influencing a model's textual output (output compliance) and compelling it to execute sensitive tool actions (action success), with the latter being substantially more challenging to achieve.
- Reusable agent assets such as 'skills' are particularly vulnerable vectors for indirect prompt injection, exhibiting higher susceptibility compared to other content types like web retrieval or document reading.
- The disagreement between rule-based and semantic evaluators (J_R and J_L) provides informative insights, highlighting that mechanical attack signals do not always equate to semantically complete attack objectives.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.