Reproduce “Mathematics in the age of AI” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Terence Tao
The essay argues that mathematical progress requires more than producing or verifying proofs: results must be explained, reviewed, accepted, and incorporated into shared knowledge. Tao describes this pipeline and warns, conditionally on the Working Hypothesis, that AI could increase proof supply faster than communities can digest it. First Proof’s Second Batch found passing solutions for seven of ten problems, but this does not establish broad capability or future proof abundance.
Key insights
- Mathematics is entering a "crisis of values and practices" triggered by AI, which mandates an explicit re-articulation of its implicit goals, much like the foundational crisis of the early 20th century.
- The historically aligned goals of mathematics (e.g., problem-solving, theory development, community building) are likely to diverge under AI-driven optimization, highlighting the need to prioritize intrinsic human-centric values.
- Human understanding, clear exposition, community acceptance, and the canonicalization of results into definitive theory are the most valuable and slowest stages of mathematical progress, defining a "complete" contribution beyond mere solution generation.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.