Reproduce “Inferred Generative-Process Diversity Predicts Correlated Failure Across Language Models” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Ross Tieman, Evan Markou
The authors test whether output-sequence structure can indicate when two language models may fail differently. They compare compressed UTF-8 response strings with byte-shuffling controls across 38 models, then relate the residual to chance-corrected shared wrong-answer agreement on ten benchmark families. The mean partial Spearman association was −0.216. This is observational, pairwise evidence, not an ensemble intervention result.
Key insights
- Effective redundancy in multi-language model systems is contingent on "generative-process diversity" (differences in underlying generative mechanisms) rather than just surface-level semantic diversity in outputs.
- The permutation-residualized NCD (d_IGP) successfully infers this process-level diversity from observable outputs, capturing a distinct and more fundamental aspect of variation than semantic similarity.
- The order-specific component of compression diversity, isolated via permutation control, exhibits a negative association with correlated failure, contrasting with the mild positive association seen in raw NCD or its frequency-preserving component.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.