Reproduce “Drift-Constrained Optimization: Only Direction Matters in Fine-Tuning Instruct Models” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Fei Yuan, Changjiang Gao, Yilei Tu, Yifeng Liu, Shujian Huang, Yu Qiao
Fine-tuning can be understood as spending a limited behavioral-drift budget, where the direction of parameter updates matters as much as their magnitude. Experiments on Qwen3 models show that layer-selective updates—especially split configurations such as b4t16—can improve scientific reasoning and multilingual translation while preserving general capabilities more effectively than full fine-tuning or KL regularization, and can provide stronger starting points for subsequent reinforcement learning.
Key insights
- Equal amounts of behavioral drift can lead to very different task outcomes, so KL magnitude alone is insufficient for evaluating fine-tuning strategies.
- Split layer updates often convert small drift budgets into better task gains than contiguous updates, while larger contiguous update regions can offer more expressivity when greater drift is acceptable.
- Effective update directions appear to form transferable families: the b4t16 configuration works across Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, and InternS1-mini-8B, and also improves reinforcement-learning initialization.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.