Reproduce “When Do We Need On-Policy Distillation? Distilling on Offline Student Rollouts Is Often Better” on OpenResearch
Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.
Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.
About this paper
Siyan Zhao, Yonggan Fu, Jindong Jiang, Shih-Yang Liu, Song Bian, Byung-Kwan Lee, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Wenliang Dai and 3 more
Semi-OPD caches responses from an initial student and teacher scores them once, then recomputes student probabilities and token-level advantages during training. Across 17 tested teacher–student pairs, it outperforms OPD on 14; the other three are close. For one Qwen3 pair, it scores 13.1 percentage points higher at the final shared step. This is not universal: initial trajectory quality and alignment matter.
Key insights
- Teacher–student alignment helps predict which approach works better: lower initial top-64 overlap is associated with larger Semi-OPD gains over on-policy distillation (Pearson r = −0.73).
- The source of cached data matters: teacher-generated responses performed worse than initial-student responses, and truncating Semi-OPD rollouts reduced performance.
- Semi-OPD depends on a capable starting student; it can underperform on-policy distillation when the initial model is weak.
Summary by alphaXiv.
Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.