Reproduce “Generative Representation Learning for Scalable Latent Tokenization” on OpenResearch

Turn your favorite coding agents into research agents that review literature, develop hypotheses, and run experiments.

Universal app for Apple silicon and Intel. Requires macOS 11 or later.

About this paper

Alan Baade, Kyle Sargent, Vincent Sitzmann, Eric Ryan Chan, Justin Johnson, Li Fei-Fei, Gordon Wetzstein

RePR trains image representations to capture how context improves a generative predictor’s predictions of image patches. It uses this signal to guide a tokenizer, then generates pixels from that representation. On ImageNet, 50,000 generations yield FID 2.18 for RePR-78M plus JiT-L versus 2.36 for pixel JiT-L at nearly matched training compute. This compares training FLOPs, not inference cost.

Key insights

  • Generative likelihood-based supervision offers an alternative to contrastive objectives and may reduce feature suppression; in a watermark stress test, RePR retained class-probing performance better than LeJEPA and DINOv3.
  • Across tested compute ranges on ImageNet and GPIC, larger or more extensively trained RePR encoders generally improved generation, with reported power-law scaling trends.
  • Representation training can be worthwhile when its cost is counted: the reported RePR system used nearly the same total FLOPs as pixel-space JiT-L while attaining a lower FID-50K.

Summary by alphaXiv.

Tip: change arxiv.org to autoarxiv.org in any arXiv abstract link to open the paper here.